Category Archives: DTES

Stealing Home

Stealing Home was held at the Interurban Gallery  (1 East Hastings, Vancouver) in february 2012. Other documentation (and  work) lost, but i found the artist statement:

Side Effects (detail)

Stealing Home is perhaps best considered a visionary environment turned in on itself to create the outlines and intimations of a home. And this home is a transitory space, and it is a struggle to feel at ease within one. Scavenged doors and windows, pieces of houses exist on their own terms and in tension with each other. Glass and mirrors face each other, bearing images as though burned into them, suffused with natural and reflected light. Salvaged words link together, building new texts and whispered associations about the problem of home and homelessness, both inside and outside.

This home is dissolving, fading from view. Many people are here because it’s at the end of things, because this is Vancouver, the terminal city: the last city on the tips of the ocean, literally unsheltered from the storms. It is a city of rebels and runaways.

Stealing Home is also a house turned in on itself, an interior exterior space. This unsettled house is also constraining: these windows do not open, nor can some even be seen through. Some look back at you.

Limited Vision

What I hope to create is an experience of this strange home: intimate moments stolen from an all-too-real world, privacy in plain sight.

No. Staggering Income Assistance Cheques Will Not Reduce Overdose Risk

Staggered cheque days will merely produce staggered emergencies. It is a supply-side, managerial-technocrat band-aid that doesn’t even purport to address the actual problem. Seriously this would put people in danger AND be a scandalous waste of money.

The problem is that by the time cheque day rolls around, people are DESPERATE. and have been for more than a couple days. More than a week, or often two — basic assistance (aka welfare) is $710 BEFORE rent – it is normal and unremarkable for people to exist in a survival mode that is incomprehensible to regular-type people. This is not a scheduling issue.

The Problem is Poverty.

Shifting cheque days around just makes the harms caused by poverty easier to manage — for health professionals and system designers and “service providers”. We continue, impoverished, to die (from the systemic injustice, ), but at more convenient times.

Cheque days are ruinous Because of the poverty. after weeks of desperation, of having to do *what one does* to survive, to not be sick, to feel a little bit ok, you finally get your cheque. What, are you going to come up with a budget so your 300$ lasts 32 days? (There is no such budget, btw.)

No, you go see your guy to pick up, right away, because you crave oblivion and to feel that feeling and not think about things today. Right now you don’t care what it is you just bought. I hear buddy said it was good—-

Decent, guaranteed basic incomes, personal & collective agency to make meaningful choices about the direction of one’s life, secure and dignified housing, safe access to regulated substances without criminal or social sanction, and a politics rooted in Justice, Respect, Love—

This is about freedom, the freedom to be human and be fully human to each other, to practice #harmreduction as a conscious constant questioning, to expand the concept of harm — we can start by acknowledging our own pain, trauma, fear — and when we see this pain in other people, we can acknowledge that reality too, and refuse to look away or seek to make that pain and all these people (like me) into a flatter line on a graph, into a data point not a human person in this world, easier for managers to manage, more convenient for coroners to count.

that is how to

stop this crysis



A response to an opinion piece published in the Vancouver Sun, June 19 2018, “Lindsay Richardson: Can Staggering Income Assistance Cheques Reduce Overdose Risk?

GIFt (fun)


Animated GIF-source.gif